🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are watching closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a growing group of nations are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that smartphones and apps are "robbing our kids' innocence". A law may be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an similar ban could be "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended parents to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic statement supporting a ban for minors without parental consent is provided. Even though it warns of the "addictive" design of these services, the move does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a good first step," stated one parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "supported by conclusive data".

Last year, support grew behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. An organization established by the relatives of a young person who died after encountering disturbing social media material argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to build products and services that are safe and suitable for minors," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the regional level amid country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule limiting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with additional time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws mandating parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from some politicians to mimic Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Beyond the West, additional nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world organizations strike a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in safety.

As this international discussion evolves, the actions of Australia and several other countries show that states internationally are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.