🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.